The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Other stuff in other stuff.

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby the cheese » 02 May 2017, 10:34

the cheese wrote:
SouthernYokel wrote:
the cheese wrote:
SouthernYokel wrote:lol'd pretty hard at radical sandwich anarchy.

i am a SR/IN


I don't understand how a SN/IN is any different from the SN/IR or how the SR/IN is any different from the SR/IR. It seems like anything right of or below the SN/IN point "True Neutral" is the same.

I laughed too hard at this. SN/IR.


SR/IN is ok with a burrito as sandwich as long as it has salty ingredients in it. a SN/IR would not accept a burrito or wrap as sandwich, but would be ok with sweet contents as long as there are 2 "sides" to the sandwich. A SR/IR thinks the moon is a sandwich. all clearly different.


I had missed the "savory ingredients" qualifier for ingredient neutral.


How does the ingredient neutral categorization handle a PB&J. Peanut butter is a very questionable savory ingredient.
Clayton Bigsby - Wed May 23, 2012 2:55 pm: i'd rather live with a guy who's kind of annoying but a nice guy than a guy who's kind of annoying and a dick
User avatar
the cheese
The Douche
 
Posts: 18427
Joined: 30 Apr 2006, 20:40
Location: 2nd Biggest Asshole

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby BigJohnStudd » 02 May 2017, 11:06

Of course a hot dog is a sandwich.
User avatar
BigJohnStudd
Skin Suit
 
Posts: 3773
Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 00:01

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby Rodney Farva » 02 May 2017, 11:51

a hot dog is a hot dog. not a sandwich.
You coin contrarian bro and say shit nonsense like this.
User avatar
Rodney Farva
Your real father
 
Posts: 24986
Joined: 15 Mar 2005, 22:17

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby MisterTambourineMan » 02 May 2017, 11:53

Rodney Farva wrote:a hot dog is a hot dog. not a sandwich.


I'm working with a retired veterinarian who's last name is Hotvet.

cool story, sco.
Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:44 am SouthernYokel you can talk about whatever inane thing you want to if you can do it without being a dick
JT99 - Tue Oct 24, 2017 5:43 pm: Dude, the MAGA thread has already sabotaged the entire site
MisterTambourineMan
Now
 
Posts: 13068
Joined: 03 Sep 2006, 14:25
Location: i already told you, won't tell you again

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby TheWolf » 02 May 2017, 11:54

MisterTambourineMan wrote:
Rodney Farva wrote:a hot dog is a hot dog. not a sandwich.


I'm working with a retired veterinarian who's last name is Hotvet.

cool story, sco.


Is he/she a sandwich?

ETA: I took my dog to the vet on Saturday. The vet was kinda hot.
"our kayaking guy sucked and came last"
- SGSW
User avatar
TheWolf
Hand-Holder
 
Posts: 18437
Joined: 16 Nov 2004, 08:17
Location: Dead

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby BigJohnStudd » 02 May 2017, 12:14

Rodney Farva wrote:a hot dog is a hot dog. not a sandwich.


It's meat inside of bread. That's a sandwich.
User avatar
BigJohnStudd
Skin Suit
 
Posts: 3773
Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 00:01

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby Rodney Farva » 02 May 2017, 12:24

BigJohnStudd wrote:
Rodney Farva wrote:a hot dog is a hot dog. not a sandwich.


It's meat inside of bread. That's a sandwich.




noap. not a sandwich.
You coin contrarian bro and say shit nonsense like this.
User avatar
Rodney Farva
Your real father
 
Posts: 24986
Joined: 15 Mar 2005, 22:17

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby SouthernYokel » 02 May 2017, 13:13

the cheese wrote:
the cheese wrote:
SouthernYokel wrote:
the cheese wrote:
SouthernYokel wrote:lol'd pretty hard at radical sandwich anarchy.

i am a SR/IN


I don't understand how a SN/IN is any different from the SN/IR or how the SR/IN is any different from the SR/IR. It seems like anything right of or below the SN/IN point "True Neutral" is the same.

I laughed too hard at this. SN/IR.


SR/IN is ok with a burrito as sandwich as long as it has salty ingredients in it. a SN/IR would not accept a burrito or wrap as sandwich, but would be ok with sweet contents as long as there are 2 "sides" to the sandwich. A SR/IR thinks the moon is a sandwich. all clearly different.


I had missed the "savory ingredients" qualifier for ingredient neutral.


How does the ingredient neutral categorization handle a PB&J. Peanut butter is a very questionable savory ingredient.


the committee for strict sandwich classification could make a convincing argument that a PB&J is a snack rather than a sandwich.
JT99 wrote:imagine working your entire board life on being a guy investigating every nook and cranny of others' sexual lives only to have some drunken baboon stumble into the r&t jackpot
User avatar
SouthernYokel
Hank the Hangover Turtle
 
Posts: 29838
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 08:09

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby the cheese » 02 May 2017, 13:48

SouthernYokel wrote:
the cheese wrote:
the cheese wrote:
SouthernYokel wrote:
the cheese wrote:
SouthernYokel wrote:lol'd pretty hard at radical sandwich anarchy.

i am a SR/IN


I don't understand how a SN/IN is any different from the SN/IR or how the SR/IN is any different from the SR/IR. It seems like anything right of or below the SN/IN point "True Neutral" is the same.

I laughed too hard at this. SN/IR.


SR/IN is ok with a burrito as sandwich as long as it has salty ingredients in it. a SN/IR would not accept a burrito or wrap as sandwich, but would be ok with sweet contents as long as there are 2 "sides" to the sandwich. A SR/IR thinks the moon is a sandwich. all clearly different.


I had missed the "savory ingredients" qualifier for ingredient neutral.


How does the ingredient neutral categorization handle a PB&J. Peanut butter is a very questionable savory ingredient.


the committee for strict sandwich classification could make a convincing argument that a PB&J is a snack rather than a sandwich.


So could the committee for neutral sandwich classification, what with their savory ingredient qualifier.
Clayton Bigsby - Wed May 23, 2012 2:55 pm: i'd rather live with a guy who's kind of annoying but a nice guy than a guy who's kind of annoying and a dick
User avatar
the cheese
The Douche
 
Posts: 18427
Joined: 30 Apr 2006, 20:40
Location: 2nd Biggest Asshole

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby Briandong79 » 03 May 2017, 12:17

Image
PhillyJim76 - Tue Nov 22, 2016 9:20 am: X?I wrote a disturbing clueless fan fiction story that got me in hot water in college
User avatar
Briandong79
Beep Boop
 
Posts: 31147
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 13:35
Location: MoreCowbell's phone

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby jman » 03 May 2017, 12:30

Briandong79 wrote:Image

gold
User avatar
jman
Bruce Dickinson
 
Posts: 790
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 21:35
Location: stayin thirsty

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby SouthernYokel » 03 May 2017, 12:55

donna #1 troll
JT99 wrote:imagine working your entire board life on being a guy investigating every nook and cranny of others' sexual lives only to have some drunken baboon stumble into the r&t jackpot
User avatar
SouthernYokel
Hank the Hangover Turtle
 
Posts: 29838
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 08:09

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby TVF wannabe » 03 May 2017, 13:38

Rodney Farva wrote:there are three sandwiches pictured in that graphic: the BLT, the chip butty and the sub. everything else there? not a sandwich.


That's what I think as well.
User avatar
TVF wannabe
The Bomb Dick
 
Posts: 5511
Joined: 07 Jun 2006, 14:16

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby Rodney Farva » 06 May 2017, 10:05

the food at the softball party was a southern bbq buffet. fried chicken, bbq beef, bbq pork, fried okra, hush puppies, slaw, potato salad. i made a sammich with pork, beef and slaw, nice roll, it was really good, and also had a piece of chicken (not bad), some okra (not too gummy) and potato salad (meh). key lime pie and cake for desert, neither was very good. washed down with a dogfish head 60.

one family (a player and her parents) were no shoes. each person had to pay on their own and we had to guarantee a head count so i had to cover the cost of the three of them. thanks! i did take home a ton of leftovers doe.
You coin contrarian bro and say shit nonsense like this.
User avatar
Rodney Farva
Your real father
 
Posts: 24986
Joined: 15 Mar 2005, 22:17

Re: The battle for dignity: What are you eating?

Postby Prez » 06 May 2017, 10:23

Rodney Farva wrote:one family (a player and her parents) were no shoes. each person had to pay on their own and we had to guarantee a head count so i had to cover the cost of the three of them. thanks! i did take home a ton of leftovers doe.


Barefoot huh?

Pro_tip: If they're responsible for paying their own cost, collect it ahead of time so you don't get screwed. Seriously, why did it fall on you to pay for them, and can't you send them a note or text telling them that they owe you x.xx dollars (or rupees)?
Ballz: So, I fucking got a BJ for $250 total, and wore a rubber. It sucked, I couldnt even feel it, so i jeckyled onto her tits. She was cute. Not even that far out of my league, it was a waste of $250
User avatar
Prez
The MAWG
 
Posts: 10004
Joined: 17 Nov 2004, 08:53
Location: Ballz deep in golf groupie pussy

PreviousNext

Return to Misc.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron