BostonSucksMyBalls wrote: Gregs Kite wrote:
BostonSucksMyBalls wrote:I said I dont have an opinion on it. I dont know enough to think its good or bad for Indy. Do you not remember that?
Also, I countered 2 of your 3 examples (that you hadnt even heard before today), and I said the trade for Trent was a mistake. You havent given me anything else substantial. Give me who they've drafted, why they were the wrong pick, and who they shouldve taken. Thats what im looking for.
After all this conversation, you have yet to form an opinion? Are you Jim Nantz and are we talking about Peyton Manning's HGH accusations? LOL!
I said I dont have one like 3 times now.
You havent given me enough evidence that you have a real opinion either, Greg Simmons.
I've stated my opinion several times that I think Ryan Grigson is a bad GM for the Colts. Several times. Several means more than once, by the way, Ebeneezer Eskin. I have also links articles with facts and evidence in terms of personnel moves and clashes with the head coach to back up my opinion why I think Ryan Grigson has been a bad GM for the Colts.
I will state again I do not think Ryan Grigson has done a good enough job as the GM of the Colts to warrant a contract extension.
I will ask again, given all we have discussed here today and the facts that you have learned today that you did not know before today, can you formulate an opinion about whether signing Ryan Grigson to a contract extension is a good move for the Colts or not?