Gregs Kite wrote:The Long Dick of the Law wrote:Gregs Kite wrote:The Long Dick of the Law wrote:Gregs Kite wrote:JichaelDick wrote:Gregs Kite wrote:Brady passed 310 yards in the '16 title game against what is the most fearsome defense in the history of ever. But he's just a system QB. I dunno, I just watch the games. Can I whine that Gostkowski was drunk and that's why he missed the extra point, forcing Brady to go for two at the end? Or does that weak cop out only count when Peyton's involved? Let me know.
STATZ are fun. Mold them, shape them, any way you want them.
I don't think Gostkowski has the history of being a liquored up kicker that Vanderjagt did, so there's that. And again, I watched the 2003 AFC Championship Game...Brady wasn't really that great that day, but Peyton was bad and Tom didn't fuck up. 3-2 is 3-2. Sorry not sorry.
So we can blame kickers when Peyton loses, but when Brady loses it's because he's a mediocre system QB? Got it.
Tom didn't fuck up, so what, the win doesn't count? Again, you guys are holding onto that third win STATZ like a 13 year old boy clutching his first boner. No sane, logical person who watches football casually, intently, or by accident will honestly say Manning had anything to do with that win. But clutch that number tightly if it makes you feel better.
Then give up Tawmy's first Super Bowl. DREW got them in and the D won it. He was last year's Peyton on that team
Vinatieri was on the defense?
Brady deserves credit for Vinatieri?
According to you, the D won it. Using that logic and remembering the game where Vinatieri scored a three point kick to win the game, ipso facto Vinatieri is on the defense, according to you.
Well on Fantasy it is D/ST so yeah, he is